A. Sabalenka
To Win
E. Mertens
To Win
Mirjam Bjorklund vs Elise Mertens Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
L W L L W L W L L L
Form
W L W L W L W W L WH2H: Bjorklund 1 - 1 Mertens
They have played 6 sets in total, with Bjorklund winning 3 and Mertens winning 3. The last match between Bjorklund and Mertens was at the U.S. Open - New York, 28-08-2023, First, Hard with Elise Mertens getting the victory 3-6 6-3 7-6(3).
| Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Mirjam Bjorklund | 1 |
| Elise Mertens | 1 |
U.S. Open - New York(28-08-2023)
3
6
6
3
7
6
| Bjorklund | Stats | Mertens |
|---|---|---|
| 29% (2-5) | YTD Win/Loss | 70% (19-8) |
| 1 | Head-to-Head | 1 |
| 549 | Ranking | 26 |
| 123 | Highest Rank | 12 |
| 26 | Age | 29 |
| - | Plays | R |
| 10 | Titles | 20 |
| 60% (219-147) | Career Total W/L | 63% (465-269) |
| $508,748 | Career Prize Money | $9,094,391 |
| 0 | YTD Titles | 1 |
| 0 | Hard H2H | 1 |
| 1 | Clay H2H | 0 |
Upcoming Match
27 Apr 2025 / Third
ODDS
Today’s Tennis Tips:
Pegula VS Uchijima PREDICTION Clay
Mutua Madrid Open - Madrid wta
27 Apr 2025 / Third
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
Sakkari VS Paolini PREDICTION Clay
Mutua Madrid Open - Madrid wta
26 Apr 2025 / Third
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3-6 6-3 7-6(3) |
Stats 
Elise Mertens
Player
Mirjam Bjorklund
54%
(
53 of
98)
1st Serve %
71%
(
105 of
147)
6
Aces
1
12
Double Faults
0
74%
(
39 of
53)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
60 of
105)
33%
(
15 of
45)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
19 of
42)
26%
(
5 of
19)
Break Points Won
42%
(
5 of
12)
45%
(
44 of
98)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
68 of
147)
122
Total Points Won
123
|
||||
| 6-1 4-6 7-6(3) |
Stats
Mirjam Bjorklund
Player
Elise Mertens
59%
(
67 of
113)
1st Serve %
50%
(
44 of
88)
5
Aces
4
7
Double Faults
19
72%
(
48 of
67)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
28 of
44)
39%
(
18 of
46)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
19 of
44)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
50%
(
4 of
8)
42%
(
47 of
113)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
41 of
88)
107
Total Points Won
94
|
||||
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches | 1 |
| 3 | Sets Won | 3 |
| 32 | Games Won | 29 |
| 6 | Aces (Total) | 10 |
| 7 | Total Double Faults | 31 |
| 2:58:40 | Average Match Time | 2:58:40 |
| 66% (172/260) | 1st Serve % | 52% (97/186) |
| 63% (108/172) | 1st Serve Win % | 69% (67/97) |
| 42% (37/88) | 2nd Serve Win % | 38% (34/89) |
| 50% (10/20) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 33% (9/27) |
| 46% (85/186) | Return Points Win % | 44% (115/260) |
| 50% (1/2) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 50% (1/2) |
| 0% (0/0) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 50% (1/2) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 50% (1/2) |
| 50% (1/2) | Deciding Set Win % | 50% (1/2) |
| 50% (2/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 50% (2/1) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 50% (2/1) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Mirjam Bjorklund Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 |
Stats
Aliaksandra Sasnovich
Player
Mirjam Bjorklund
72%
(
33 of
46)
1st Serve %
53%
(
40 of
75)
5
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
6
73%
(
24 of
33)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
20 of
40)
69%
(
9 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
49%
(
17 of
35)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
28%
(
13 of
46)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
38 of
75)
71
Total Points Won
50
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Elena Gabriela Ruse
Player
Mirjam Bjorklund
60%
(
50 of
84)
1st Serve %
75%
(
60 of
80)
6
Aces
5
5
Double Faults
2
68%
(
34 of
50)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
34 of
60)
35%
(
12 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
8 of
20)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
50%
(
6 of
12)
45%
(
38 of
84)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
38 of
80)
84
Total Points Won
80
|
2-6 6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Maya Joint
Player
Mirjam Bjorklund
49%
(
42 of
86)
1st Serve %
62%
(
54 of
87)
2
Aces
1
9
Double Faults
3
69%
(
29 of
42)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
26 of
54)
30%
(
13 of
44)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
10 of
33)
53%
(
9 of
17)
Break Points Won
70%
(
7 of
10)
51%
(
44 of
86)
Rtn Points Won
59%
(
51 of
87)
93
Total Points Won
80
|
6-2 4-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Mirjam Bjorklund
Player
Olivia Gadecki
74%
(
65 of
88)
1st Serve %
56%
(
51 of
91)
0
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
9
55%
(
36 of
65)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
26 of
51)
43%
(
10 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
15 of
40)
69%
(
9 of
13)
Break Points Won
43%
(
6 of
14)
48%
(
42 of
88)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
50 of
91)
96
Total Points Won
83
|
6-4 5-7 6-0 | H2H | ||
| Q2 |
Stats
Lucija Ciric Bagaric
Player
Mirjam Bjorklund
62%
(
53 of
86)
1st Serve %
67%
(
58 of
86)
3
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
1
66%
(
35 of
53)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
38 of
58)
61%
(
20 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
14 of
28)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
36%
(
31 of
86)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
34 of
86)
89
Total Points Won
83
|
6-2 4-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Mirjam Bjorklund
Player
Alycia Parks
73%
(
40 of
55)
1st Serve %
60%
(
39 of
65)
0
Aces
9
2
Double Faults
9
63%
(
25 of
40)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
22 of
39)
67%
(
10 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
9 of
26)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
13%
(
1 of
8)
36%
(
20 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
34 of
65)
69
Total Points Won
51
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Anca Alexia Todoni
Player
Mirjam Bjorklund
68%
(
25 of
37)
1st Serve %
58%
(
26 of
45)
7
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
0
80%
(
20 of
25)
1st Serve Won
46%
(
12 of
26)
100%
(
12 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
8 of
19)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
14%
(
5 of
37)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
25 of
45)
57
Total Points Won
25
|
6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q2 |
Stats
Elizabeth Mandlik
Player
Mirjam Bjorklund
60%
(
44 of
73)
1st Serve %
55%
(
32 of
58)
1
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
4
59%
(
26 of
44)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
20 of
32)
52%
(
15 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
11 of
26)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
33%
(
3 of
9)
44%
(
32 of
73)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
27 of
58)
68
Total Points Won
63
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Mirjam Bjorklund
Player
Anastasiia Sobolieva
69%
(
48 of
70)
1st Serve %
73%
(
47 of
64)
2
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
3
65%
(
31 of
48)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
25 of
47)
45%
(
10 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
6 of
17)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
41%
(
29 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
33 of
64)
74
Total Points Won
60
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Yafan Wang
Player
Mirjam Bjorklund
71%
(
50 of
70)
1st Serve %
62%
(
43 of
69)
2
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
3
66%
(
33 of
50)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
26 of
43)
50%
(
10 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
12 of
26)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
39%
(
27 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
31 of
69)
74
Total Points Won
65
|
7-5 6-4 | H2H | ||
view more
Elise Mertens Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2 |
Stats
Elise Mertens
Player
Maria Camila Osorio Serrano
61%
(
38 of
62)
1st Serve %
68%
(
40 of
59)
3
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
4
82%
(
31 of
38)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
22 of
40)
38%
(
9 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
58%
(
11 of
19)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
35%
(
22 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
26 of
59)
66
Total Points Won
55
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Aryna Sabalenka
Player
Elise Mertens
74%
(
39 of
53)
1st Serve %
58%
(
31 of
53)
5
Aces
4
0
Double Faults
1
67%
(
26 of
39)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
19 of
31)
79%
(
11 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
7 of
22)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
30%
(
16 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
27 of
53)
64
Total Points Won
42
|
6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Elise Mertens
Player
Diana Shnaider
60%
(
37 of
62)
1st Serve %
61%
(
51 of
83)
8
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
5
76%
(
28 of
37)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
29 of
51)
48%
(
12 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
15 of
32)
25%
(
4 of
16)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
35%
(
22 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
39 of
83)
79
Total Points Won
66
|
6-2 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Elise Mertens
Player
Aliaksandra Sasnovich
54%
(
36 of
67)
1st Serve %
62%
(
44 of
71)
5
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
5
64%
(
23 of
36)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
30 of
44)
58%
(
18 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
26%
(
7 of
27)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
39%
(
26 of
67)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
34 of
71)
75
Total Points Won
63
|
7-6(3) 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R3 |
Stats
Qinwen Zheng
Player
Elise Mertens
59%
(
57 of
97)
1st Serve %
58%
(
47 of
81)
6
Aces
1
5
Double Faults
8
68%
(
39 of
57)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
28 of
47)
48%
(
19 of
40)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
15 of
34)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
33%
(
4 of
12)
40%
(
39 of
97)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
38 of
81)
96
Total Points Won
82
|
6-3 3-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Elise Mertens
Player
Varvara Gracheva
52%
(
39 of
75)
1st Serve %
47%
(
37 of
78)
3
Aces
0
7
Double Faults
4
67%
(
26 of
39)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
21 of
37)
50%
(
18 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
16 of
41)
40%
(
6 of
15)
Break Points Won
27%
(
3 of
11)
41%
(
31 of
75)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
41 of
78)
85
Total Points Won
68
|
6-3 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R3 |
Stats
Iga Swiatek
Player
Elise Mertens
65%
(
46 of
71)
1st Serve %
56%
(
39 of
70)
6
Aces
5
3
Double Faults
2
72%
(
33 of
46)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
25 of
39)
44%
(
11 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
11 of
31)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
38%
(
27 of
71)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
34 of
70)
78
Total Points Won
63
|
7-6(2) 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Elise Mertens
Player
Peyton Stearns
39%
(
18 of
46)
1st Serve %
61%
(
30 of
49)
4
Aces
1
7
Double Faults
4
78%
(
14 of
18)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
16 of
30)
54%
(
15 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
16%
(
3 of
19)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
37%
(
17 of
46)
Rtn Points Won
61%
(
30 of
49)
59
Total Points Won
36
|
6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R3 |
Stats
Madison Keys
Player
Elise Mertens
59%
(
76 of
128)
1st Serve %
54%
(
66 of
123)
5
Aces
1
12
Double Faults
9
75%
(
57 of
76)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
46 of
66)
33%
(
17 of
52)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
23 of
57)
38%
(
6 of
16)
Break Points Won
20%
(
3 of
15)
42%
(
54 of
128)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
54 of
123)
128
Total Points Won
123
|
6-2 6-7(8) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Elise Mertens
Player
Kimberly Birrell
59%
(
41 of
69)
1st Serve %
61%
(
39 of
64)
10
Aces
1
7
Double Faults
3
76%
(
31 of
41)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
22 of
39)
46%
(
13 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
60%
(
15 of
25)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
36%
(
25 of
69)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
27 of
64)
71
Total Points Won
62
|
6-4 7-5 | H2H | ||
view more
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 60% (219/147) | Win/Loss | 63% (465/269) |
| 59% (487/341) | Sets Win/Loss | 61% (1020/658) |
| 54% (4031/3394) | Games Win/Loss | 55% (8360/6793) |
| 56% (59/47) | Hard Win/Loss | 66% (272/142) |
| 65% (128/70) | Clay Win/Loss | 63% (108/64) |
| 48% (23/25) | Indoor Hard W/L | 61% (51/32) |
| 64% (9/5) | Grass Win/Loss | 52% (34/31) |
| 0.15 | Aces Per Game | 0.25 |
| 538 | Aces Total | 1860 |
| 0.17 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.35 |
| 602 | Total Double Faults | 2569 |
| 1:28:13 | Average Match Time | 1:17:20 |
| 461.51 | Average Opponent Rank | 381.43 |
| 65% (14303/21932) | 1st Serve % | 59% (22404/37936) |
| 61% (8682/14303) | 1st Serve Win % | 66% (14846/22404) |
| 47% (3579/7629) | 2nd Serve Win % | 45% (7002/15523) |
| 47% (1461/3083) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 48% (2430/5085) |
| 47% (10586/22367) | Return Points Win % | 46% (18110/39215) |
| 63% (17/10) | Slam W/L | 68% (78/37) |
| 25% (4/12) | Masters W/L | 52% (65/61) |
| 50% (2/2) | Cups W/L | 64% (9/5) |
| 38% (11/18) | Main Tour W/L | 63% (165/99) |
| 0% (0/0) | Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 62% (107/65) | Challenger W/L | 61% (83/52) |
| 66% (78/40) | Futures W/L | 81% (65/15) |
| 60% (215/356) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 63% (457/722) |
| 0% (0/2) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 63% (5/8) |
| 53% (34/64) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 46% (64/139) |
| 50% (51/102) | Deciding Set Win % | 56% (115/207) |
| 87% (223/195) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 88% (463/409) |
| 12% (223/27) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 11% (463/53) |
| 16% (143/23) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 20% (271/53) |
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
